Doge today
Michelle King Resigns as SSA Commissioner After Clash with Musk’s DOGE Over Social Security Data
Michelle King, the acting commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA), has officially resigned following a dispute with Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) over access to confidential Social Security recipient data.
Why Did Michelle King Resign?
King, a 30-year veteran of the SSA, stepped down after resisting DOGE’s request for data access, citing privacy, security, and legal concerns under the Federal Privacy Act. DOGE, a newly established federal agency focused on reducing government spending and streamlining operations, argued that the data would help detect fraudulent claims and improve efficiency.
However, the SSA enforces strict privacy measures to protect millions of Americans’ personal and financial information. Critics warn that allowing broader access to such records could create serious privacy risks and set a dangerous precedent for government data-sharing practices.
DOGE’s Previous Data Access Controversy
This isn’t the first time DOGE has sought access to sensitive federal records. A similar attempt to retrieve data from the IRS’s Integrated Data Retrieval System sparked significant backlash, with privacy advocates and IRS officials warning of potential confidentiality breaches and data misuse.
Who Is the New SSA Commissioner?
Following King’s resignation, Leland Dudek has been appointed as the new acting commissioner of the SSA. Dudek is a proponent of data-driven governance and has previously worked on government modernization initiatives. His leadership suggests the SSA may become more open to collaboration with DOGE, but no official policy changes have been announced yet.
Political Debate: Privacy vs. Efficiency
King’s resignation has ignited a political debate over how far government agencies should go in modernizing operations without compromising citizen privacy.
- Supporters of DOGE argue that expanding data access can help reduce fraud and improve efficiency in federal programs.
- Privacy advocates and lawmakers, however, caution against potential government overreach, warning that such policies could weaken privacy protections and increase surveillance risks.
What’s Next for the SSA and DOGE?
With Dudek’s appointment, the SSA may reevaluate its stance on data-sharing policies. However, privacy concerns are unlikely to disappear, and future debates over data security and government transparency are expected.
Do you think the government should prioritize efficiency over privacy, or is data security too important to compromise?
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com
