411
Unpacking the R2.2 Billion Guarantee Dispute Surrounding Ithala Bank: What’s at Stake for KZN and National Treasury?
A major dispute has unfolded surrounding the future of Ithala Bank, a provincially owned financial institution facing liquidation, with the KZN government seeking a R2.2 billion guarantee. At the heart of the dispute lies a warning from the National Treasury, which has clarified its stance on the matter: it is prioritizing customer protection over bailing out the bank.
The issue centers on a guarantee that the KwaZulu-Natal provincial government has requested from the National Treasury. The guarantee, worth R2.2 billion, is intended to facilitate the process of transferring Ithala Bank’s deposits to a commercial bank, but the Treasury has made it clear that its primary responsibility is to protect customers, not to prop up the struggling financial institution.
What Led to the Guarantee Dispute?
Ithala Bank, owned by the KZN provincial government, is currently facing liquidation following an application by the Prudential Authority through a Repayment Administrator (RA). In a recent briefing, Dr. Thulani Vilakazi, CEO of Ithala Bank, revealed that despite ongoing negotiations, the Treasury had chosen to direct the guarantee to the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) rather than the provincial government.
The province believes that securing this guarantee is essential to ensuring that a commercial bank takes over Ithala Bank’s deposits. However, differing interpretations of the guarantee’s purpose have led to confusion. While the province sees the guarantee as a way to facilitate the transfer of deposits, the Treasury has emphasized that its responsibility is to safeguard the interests of the bank’s customers, not to bail out Ithala.
National Treasury’s Position: Protecting Depositors
In response to the ongoing dispute, the National Treasury has issued a statement reiterating its commitment to protecting customers. It stressed that its role is consistent with past practice, as seen in similar situations with other troubled financial institutions, such as Habib Bank, African Bank, and VBS. The Treasury’s focus, according to its statements, is on ensuring that depositors are compensated and not on providing financial support to Ithala Bank itself.
The Treasury also highlighted that the approach it has taken aligns with the Deposit Insurance Scheme, which has been designed to safeguard depositors in the event of financial instability within a bank. The clear message from the Treasury is that it will not use taxpayer money to bail out a provincially owned entity like Ithala Bank.
KZN’s Response and the Path Forward
The KZN provincial government, led by Finance Minister Francois Rodgers, expressed frustration over the shifting stance of the Treasury. Rodgers pointed out that the guarantee was initially intended to be a loan, with both Ithala and the province responsible for repaying the interest. This arrangement would have allowed for smoother collaboration between Ithala Bank and a commercial bank, ensuring customers’ access to their funds.
KZN Premier Thami Ntuli also voiced concerns, stating that some aspects of the Treasury’s decision remain unclear. The provincial government is now in the process of requesting clarification from the Minister of Finance.
Despite the ongoing dispute, Minister Rodgers remains confident that Ithala Bank’s liquidation will proceed, asserting that the bank’s assets exceed its liabilities, and there is no reason for it to be liquidated beyond protecting depositors.
Also Read: Ithala’s Betrayal: The Systematic Erasure of Black Banks in South Africa
What’s Next for Ithala Bank Customers?
As the dispute between the KZN provincial government and the National Treasury continues, one group remains at the center of this controversy: the customers of Ithala Bank. These customers have been unable to access their accounts for months, and the uncertainty surrounding the guarantee only adds to their frustration.
The National Treasury has made it clear that its top priority is ensuring that depositors are protected. This focus on deposit protection will likely shape the outcome of the dispute, even as both the KZN government and Ithala Bank seek to find a solution that guarantees customers can access their funds without delay.
The Ithala Bank guarantee dispute highlights the complex balancing act between provincial and national interests when dealing with troubled financial institutions. While the KZN government seeks financial assistance for the bank, the National Treasury remains firm in its stance to protect the interests of the bank’s customers. As the situation evolves, the priority will undoubtedly be ensuring that depositors are not left in the lurch.
{Source: IOL}
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com
