Court Orders Full Disclosure of Steinhoff Forensic Report

In a landmark ruling, South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has ordered the release of the full forensic report into Steinhoff’s massive corporate fraud scandal. The judgment reinforces the primacy of the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) and the critical role of transparency in upholding public interest.

On December 4, 2024, the SCA unanimously dismissed Steinhoff’s appeal to block the release of the 4,000-page report prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). This report unveils a decade of fraudulent activities that wiped out 98% of Steinhoff’s share value and cost investors over R200 billion, including the retirement savings of millions of South Africans.

Justice Ashton Schippers, writing for the court, described Steinhoff’s attempts to withhold the report as “untenable” and emphasized the importance of public access to prevent future scandals.

The Public Interest Override

The ruling hinges on Section 70 of PAIA, which mandates disclosure if the information:

• Reveals significant legal violations.
• Highlights risks to public safety.
• Serves a clear public interest.

“This is a classic case where the public interest in disclosure outweighs any potential harm to Steinhoff,” said Justice Schippers. He criticized the company’s evasive tactics, adding that the public deserves to know the full extent of South Africa’s largest corporate scandal.

Steinhoff was once lauded as a South African corporate success story. However, the PwC summary—released in 2019—revealed irregular transactions that inflated the company’s profits and assets for years. Investors, including major pension funds, were misled into believing in Steinhoff’s financial health.

The full report, long shielded by claims of litigation privilege, could finally shed light on how billions were lost and prevent future corporate malpractice.

What Happens Next?

If Steinhoff’s successor, Ibex RSA Holdco Limited, does not appeal the ruling, it has 10 days to release the report. Failure to comply could lead to further legal consequences.

The ruling is a victory for transparency and a reminder that corporate misconduct must face public scrutiny.

Key Takeaways

• Transparency Triumphs: The SCA ruling underscores the importance of public interest over corporate secrecy.
• Impact on Investors: The scandal affected millions of South Africans through pension losses and market devaluation.
• Corporate Accountability: This judgment sets a precedent for holding corporations accountable for fraud.
• Future Implications: Public access to the full report may help restore trust in South Africa’s corporate governance.

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com