Storm Over BELA Act: Education Law Sparks Political Showdown in South Africa

The recently signed Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act has ignited a fierce debate over the future of South Africa’s education system. Two clauses within the Act—aimed at reshaping school language and admission policies—have drawn sharp criticism, delaying their implementation and exposing political fault lines.

What is the BELA Act?

The BELA Act, passed by Parliament in October 2023 and signed into law in September 2024, seeks to reform education by promoting inclusivity and equity. However, two contentious provisions, Clause 4 and Clause 5, have caused public and political uproar.

• Clause 4: Expands government oversight, requiring schools to admit undocumented learners.
• Clause 5: Mandates provincial approval of school language policies, considering the area’s demographics.

The Delays and Disputes

President Cyril Ramaphosa delayed implementing these clauses for three months, citing the need for additional consultation. A subsequent agreement between the Minister of Basic Education and Solidarity proposed further delays to develop norms and standards.

While the agreement was welcomed by some, the Presidency clarified that it has no legal effect on the President’s powers. “The President is bound by the Constitution and remains committed to ensuring transformation in the education sector,” said spokesperson Vincent Magwenya.

The Act has drawn mixed reactions:

• Critics, including Solidarity and AfriForum, argue it threatens school autonomy and risks marginalizing Afrikaans-speaking schools.
• Supporters, like the ANC, view it as a necessary step toward dismantling lingering inequalities in education.

The BELA Act has also highlighted tensions within the Government of National Unity (GNU). Deputy President Paul Mashatile accused the DA of bypassing proper processes, while DA leaders defended their role, calling for constructive dialogue.

President Ramaphosa will determine the Act’s commencement date after consultations conclude. Stakeholders are encouraged to submit proposals on how to address concerns surrounding Clauses 4 and 5.

Reactions from School Governing Bodies

School Governing Bodies (SGBs) play a pivotal role in South African education, particularly in public schools, where they exercise significant autonomy. Under the BELA Act, their authority is reduced, sparking widespread concern:

• Loss of Autonomy: Clause 5 undermines SGBs by requiring provincial department approval for language policies.
• Challenges for Smaller Schools: Many governing bodies fear they lack the resources to meet new norms and standards.
• Inclusivity vs. Capacity: SGBs in under-resourced schools argue that admitting undocumented learners without increased support could strain existing infrastructure.

Notable Quote: A governing body representative said, “While we support inclusivity, the Act disregards the logistical and financial challenges schools face in implementing these changes.”

Potential Legal Challenges

The BELA Act could face legal opposition from advocacy groups like AfriForum and Solidarity, who argue it contravenes constitutional rights:

• Language Rights: Section 29(2) of the Constitution protects the right to receive education in one’s language of choice where practicable. Opponents argue Clause 5 might erode this protection.
• Parental Choice: Critics claim Clause 4 undermines parents’ right to choose schools that align with their values and language preferences.
• Judicial Review: Solidarity has hinted at pursuing a judicial review to challenge the implementation of these clauses.

Legal Precedent: Past rulings, such as the Constitutional Court’s decision in Governing Body of the Rivonia Primary School v MEC for Education: Gauteng Province (2013), may influence the interpretation of the BELA Act.

Impact on Afrikaans-Medium Schools

The proposed language policy changes under Clause 5 have raised specific concerns for Afrikaans-speaking communities:

• Marginalization Risks: Afrikaans-medium schools fear being forced to offer dual or multi-language instruction, potentially diluting their cultural identity.
• Cultural Autonomy: Opponents argue that requiring demographic-based approvals could diminish Afrikaans’ status in education.
• Proponents’ View: Supporters contend that inclusivity aligns with South Africa’s multicultural ethos and addresses historical disparities.

Afrikaans Advocate’s Perspective: AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel said, “This is not about language alone; it’s about protecting community schools from being reduced to generic institutions.”

Broader Implications for Equity and Transformation

The BELA Act’s supporters emphasize its potential to level the educational playing field, particularly in historically disadvantaged areas:

• Access for All: Clause 4 aims to ensure that undocumented learners, often from marginalized communities, are not excluded.
• Equity in Resources: By aligning policies with broader demographics, the Act seeks to balance resource allocation in oversubscribed areas.
• Resistance to Change: Critics accuse wealthier schools of protecting privileges at the expense of national transformation goals.

Expert Insight: Education analyst Mary Metcalfe remarked, “The BELA Act challenges us to rethink fairness in a post-apartheid education system. It’s not perfect but starts important conversations.”

Possible Middle Ground Solutions

Stakeholders have suggested alternative approaches to balance inclusivity with autonomy:

• Localized Norms: Allow SGBs to draft context-specific policies that meet inclusivity goals without compromising their unique character.
• Incremental Implementation: Introduce phased changes to give schools time to adapt.
• Collaboration with Communities: Work with parents, educators, and cultural groups to ensure that policies are fair and practical.

Global Perspective: Countries like Canada and Belgium, known for bilingual education models, provide examples of how to respect linguistic diversity while ensuring equity.

The BELA Act represents a pivotal moment in South Africa’s educational reform journey. Balancing inclusivity with autonomy will require careful deliberation and adherence to constitutional principles.

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com